• Papers must be submitted online using the Microsoft CMT, which is a completely web-based submission, peer-review, and tracking system.
• All submissions must be in English and include a brief abstract in word format. It will be evaluated by independent experts (at least three) in the   Blind peer review process.
• All pages must be numbered in the same order. Tables and figures can be included within the text or placed on other pages with appropriate   captions (s).
• The title of the paper, the author's name(s), and entire institutional affiliation(s) should all be mentioned on the first page of the manuscript. There   should also be an abbreviated title (for running heads).
• A list of 4-6 keywords should be provided immediately after the abstract. These keywords should be relatively independent (coordinate index terms)   and should best describe the paper.
• All the references should be mentioned in alphabetical order.

The paper will be checked for plagiarism with turnitin, the similarity should be less than 20%.

NOTE: Submissions that do not follow the above instructions may be returned to the authors for correction before being published.

Ethical considerations and the prevention of malpractice are crucial in the publication of manuscripts in proceedings. Below are common rules and components typically included in the Ethics and Malpractice Statement for publishing manuscripts.

Authorship and Contributor ship

Clearly define criteria for authorship, ensuring that individuals who have made significant contributions are acknowledged as authors. State that all listed authors have approved the manuscript and agree to its submission for publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should explicitly state that manuscripts must be original work and not published elsewhere. They should also emphasize the prohibition of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, and outline consequences for violations.

Data and Results Integrity

It is a mandate that authors provide accurate and truthful data and results. They should also address concerns related to data fabrication, falsification, or manipulation if any.

Conflicts of interests

Authors require to disclose any conflicts of interest that could influence the research or its interpretation. Should also specify how the conflicts of interests will be handled during the review process.

Ethical approval and Informed Consent

Authors require to provide evidence of ethical approval for human and animal research. A mandate of inclusion of informed consent from participants in studies involving human subjects.

Reviewer confidentiality

The review policy is built on principles of trust, objectivity, and confidentiality. Reviewers play a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity and quality of the proceedings. By accepting to review a manuscript, reviewers agree to abide by the following confidentiality guidelines. Our reviewers are committed in treating all submitted manuscripts as privileged and confidential documents. Manuscripts and any accompanying materials will not be disclosed to anyone or discussed with anyone not directly involved in the review process. Reviewers will not share, copy, or distribute any part of the manuscript without explicit permission from the proceedings' editorial board. Our reviewers maintain anonymity throughout the review process unless otherwise specified by the proceedings' editorial policy. Efforts are made to ensure that the reviewers identity remains confidential to the authors. Information obtained during the review process, including ideas, data, or interpretations, should not be used for personal gain or any other purpose unrelated to the peer review.

Editorial Responsibility

The Editorial Board of ICSSCGE proceedings plays a pivotal role in upholding the scholarly standards and integrity of the conference. Members of the Editorial Board are expected to adhere to the following responsibilities:
We uphold the principles of editorial independence, ensuring that decisions are made impartially and free from any undue influence. We avoid conflicts of interest that may compromise the objectivity of editorial decisions. We oversee the peer review process to ensure its fairness, thoroughness, and adherence to the highest academic standards. We appoint qualified and impartial reviewers to evaluate submitted manuscripts. We work collaboratively with authors, and reviewers, to ensure timely publication of accepted manuscripts. We participate in regular editorial board meetings to discuss and implement improvements to the peer review process and editorial policies. We seek feedback from authors and reviewers to enhance the overall publication experience.